"almost none of what Clinton said was accurate"
Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 12:58:06 PM PDT
We aren't finished yet with Trina Bachtel's death and Hillary Clinton's casual misrepresentation of it. Although the national media have been eager to move on, the Ohio press is taking their responsibility to get the truth seriously.
Today, the Columbus Dispatch's Jack Torry and Catherine Candinsky provide the most complete account yet of Bachtel's story.
They show just how comprehensively wrong Clinton was, but also how extraordinarily incurious the media has been about Clinton's false account.
They also remind us of a larger context that has been lost in reporting so far -- of the injustice that is done to Trina Bachtel and her family by distorting the circumstances of her death.
MN-1: State Supreme Court Keeps Gil Gutknecht on Ballot
Wed Aug 23, 2006 at 04:58:19 PM PDT
The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that Republican Gil Gutknecht's name will remain on the ballot for the September 12th primary in the First Congressional District, despite his campaign's failure to gather required petition signatures within the candidate filing period. The court did not issue an opinion to justify their decision, though it said that one will be issued later.
In Minnesota, candidates may file a petition with at least 1000 signatures instead of paying a $300 filing fee. Gutknecht is the only Congressional candidate in Minnesota who filed a petition instead of paying the fee. Many of the Gutknecht campaign's signatures were apparently gathered four months before the July 4 to July 18 filing period. I surmise that they were gathered during the precinct caucuses and county conventions, which were held in early and late March, respectively.
Republican Culture of Corruption: Oregon Edition
Wed Jan 04, 2006 at 03:02:32 PM PDT
Has Craig Berkman really escaped notice so far on dailykos? I don't get any hits on a search.
With so much Republican sleaze on tap, I suppose it's easy to miss one more scandal. But this one seems pretty big to me.
Craig Berkman is the former chair of the Oregon GOP, and he ran for US Senate as a Republican, too. He now stands accused of bilking more than $33 million dollars from investors in his venture-capital funds.
Portugal: Another Bush Ally Loses
Tue Feb 22, 2005 at 10:30:21 PM PDT
It looks like no one else is going to post this, so I will: Portugal's conservative coalition government, which supported Bush's invasion of Iraq, was
swept out of power by the Socialist Party in Sunday's election.
An overwhelming majority of Portugal's citizens opposed the war in Iraq. That was a big factor in the ruling coalition's loss, though they were astonishingly incompetent as well -- as I recall, schools across the country had to start weeks late this year because of a budgeting snafu.
It's amazing how little attention this is getting, even here. If the conservative coalition had won, all of the mainstream conservative media would be trumpeting this as a vindication for Bush.
Freep this poll: NO to WA revote
Wed Dec 29, 2004 at 07:16:33 PM PDT
Dino Rossi (R-Sore Loser) is calling for a re-vote of the gubernatorial election he lost in Washington State.
The Seattle Times already has a poll up about it on the page with their article. No leads yes by a mere 52% to 48% right now.
Let Rossi know that its time to get over it, concede, and move on.
Report: Bush Military Records Found
Fri Jul 23, 2004 at 02:32:26 PM PDT
Reuters reports the Pentagon has now
"found" Bush's National Guard payroll records.
What about last week's spin that the records had been destroyed? A "clerical error."
I suppose it's just very convenient that this came out on Friday afternoon, and on the Friday before the Democratic Convention besides. That will bury the story for a week, at least. By then, it will be "old news" -- not worth talking about. Of course, this regime wouldn't let the Pentagon be corrupted by political considerations like that, now would they?
F 9/11 in smaller cities
Sat Jun 26, 2004 at 09:11:09 AM PDT
I am interested in the reception of Moore's film outside the larger metro areas.
Here in Rochester, Minn. (population about 85,000), I was mildly surprised to see the film was going to show at all.
ABC News Washington Post Poll: Kerry leads Bush by 9%
Tue Mar 09, 2004 at 07:59:07 PM PDT
An ABC News/Washington Post
poll released today shows Kerry leading Bush 53% to 44% in a two-way matchup.
In a three-way matchup, Kerry's lead is 48% to 44%, with Nader taking 3%.
It's interesting that the story about the poll in the Post only has the numbers for the three-way matchup, although they do mention the margin in a two-way matchup. We certainly wouldn't want to print a number that shows Kerry comfortably over 50%, now would we? Of course, there would never, ever be reason to suspect the Post of right-wing bias.
Who sent the hecklers?
Wed Jan 21, 2004 at 11:04:22 AM PDT
Great political theater yesterday. A few scumbags waving rebel flags repeatedly interrupted a Howard Dean rally. Dean finally drowned them out by leading the whole crowd in the National Anthem. Class. And pure gold any time it gets shown on TV.
I really wonder which campaign sent the hecklers, though. Seems typical of the campaign of a candidate with a five-letter, two syllable name. I just want to know so I can send them a big thank you note.
ARG NH tracking Jan. 7-9
Sat Jan 10, 2004 at 12:59:28 PM PDT
ARG NH tracking: Clark breaks 20%, Dean stays level
Fri Jan 09, 2004 at 12:52:01 PM PDT
Jan. 6-8 tracking (5-7 in parentheses)
Dean 35 (35)
Clark 20 (18)
Kerry 11 (12)
Lieberman 8 (8)
Gephardt 5 (6)
Edwards 3 (3)
Kucinich 2 (2)
Undecided 16 (16)
NH tracking poll, ARG, Jan 2-4
Mon Jan 05, 2004 at 11:53:05 AM PDT
Steady ...
Dean 39 (39)
Kerry 14 (14)
Clark 12 (12)
Gephardt 6 (6)
Lieberman 6 (6)
Edwards 3 (3)
Kucinich 2 (3)
Braun 0 (0)
Sharpton 0 (0)
Other 1 (1)
Undecided 17 (16)
Four reasons Saddam's capture will lead to increased tension and violence in Iraq.
Sun Dec 14, 2003 at 12:03:35 PM PDT
The TV news presenters are already heralding Saddam's capture as the beginning of a new dawn of peace and prosperity for Iraq. That's no surprise from a group unused to the discipline of strategic political analysis. But while it is surely a victory for justice to see Saddam captured and brought to account, it is naive to expect more stability and support for American policy as a result. Here are four reasons that today's optimists will soon be revising their expectations.
1. Iraqis will no longer fear the return of Saddam. Wait, isn't this the main reason support will increase for Americans in Iraq? Well, no. The truth is, we're never going to have enthusiastic support from most Iraqis. A lot of stateside pundits want to believe in a vast, silent majority of Iraqis who are thrilled to have us there. In reality, we have had grudging support from a lot of Iraqis who have seen us as the lesser of two evils. Now that they are no longer worried about the Saddam, many will no longer see much reason to tolerate an American occupation and administration. We may, moreover, see not just a collapse of support for the American occupation of Iraq, but an explosion of sympathy and assistance for the Baathist resistance, because ordinary Iraqis will no longer fear that a Baathist victory would return Saddam to power.
2. Iraq's social and political factions have lost a common enemy. On TV this morning you can see small but enthusiastic demonstrations of Kurds, Shiites, and Communists, among others. Other than successes of the national soccer team, this is about the only thing they are likely celebrate together. Up until now, the tensions between these groups have been partially obscured. Now, Iraq's factions will increasingly focus on their clashing interests and demands.
3. Iraqis will be increasingly suspicious of our motives for staying on. There is already a pretty common belief in Iraq that we are just there to grab oil. Now that Saddam is in our hands, many Iraqis will find it increasingly hard to credit any other motive, and this will increase support for resistance to the occupation.
4. Iraqi Baathist insurgents will be fighting more directly to advance their own ambitions. Until now, any Baathist resistance leader had to know that success in driving out the Americans and returning the Baathists to power (not a likely scenario, but the one they were fighting for) would put Saddam back in charge. They surely saw Saddam's return as a better deal than the American occupation, in which they are frozen out of power and privilege. But now every Baathist rebel leader can believe that a better deal yet is available to him -- a Baathist restoration where he gets to be the one in charge. Now Baathists rebels will believe they have good reason to press attacks with even more vigor and resolve.